A few months ago, I found myself staring at a restaurant menu and realizing I had absolutely no idea what I wanted to eat. This is unusual for me. I spend an unreasonable percentage of my life thinking about food, restaurants, menus and consumer behavior. Put me in front of a menu and indecision is rarely the problem. Yet this particular menu was exhausting. There was a miso Caesar salad, a gochujang cheeseburger, truffle hot honey chicken, a birria-inspired something, yuzu kosho pasta and a "deconstructed" tiramisu that appeared to contain everything except tiramisu. The cocktail list included clarified milk, pandan, fermented pineapple and several ingredients that required either Google or a degree in botany.
Nothing was necessarily wrong with any of it. In fact, several dishes sounded quite good. The problem was that everything was trying desperately hard to be interesting. I eventually asked the server what he ate after his shift. "The burger," he said. I pointed to the gochujang burger. "That one?" He laughed. "No. I ask the kitchen to leave all that stuff off."
And there it was. A small and admittedly unscientific exchange, but one that captures a question I believe restaurant owners and executives should be asking as we approach 2027: are consumers finally suffering from trend fatigue?
For the past 15 years, my company, The Next Idea Group, has produced an annual Restaurant & Food Trends Report, and during that time I have watched the speed of change within food culture accelerate dramatically. Trends that once developed over several years can now be discovered, amplified, copied, commercialized and exhausted in a matter of months. Social media has effectively industrialized food discovery. An obscure regional dish can appear on TikTok in January, migrate onto independent restaurant menus by March, be incorporated into a national chain LTO by August and arrive as a frozen supermarket product before Christmas. By the time many consumers actually encounter the "new" trend, the early adopters have already moved on.
That acceleration creates an interesting strategic problem. Innovation remains enormously important, but novelty and innovation are not the same thing. Innovation creates value, whereas novelty creates difference. Sometimes those two things intersect beautifully. Increasingly, however, I wonder whether parts of our industry have confused the relentless introduction of something different with the creation of something consumers genuinely value.
The distinction is critical because I am emphatically not suggesting that restaurant and food trends are disappearing in 2027. That would be rather unfortunate timing after 15 years of publishing an annual trends report. Quite the opposite, I believe trends are becoming more consequential because consumers are becoming considerably more selective about which ones they allow into their lives.
The mistake would be to interpret trend fatigue as a rejection of change, I would suggest it is more likely a rejection of change without purpose. Consumers are not telling restaurants to stop innovating; they are raising the price of admission. Innovation increasingly has to improve something: taste, health, convenience, value, experience, transparency, sustainability or emotional connection. "New," on its own, may simply no longer be enough.
The Consumer Hasn't Stopped Spending, the Consumer Has Started Editing.
The economic environment makes this question considerably more important. The U.S. restaurant industry remains enormous and remarkably resilient, with the National Restaurant Association projecting restaurant and foodservice sales of approximately $1.55 trillion in 2026. Restaurants also remain deeply embedded in consumer life despite continuing economic pressure. In the Association's third-quarter 2026 consumer research, 53% of consumers had dined at a restaurant during the previous week and 50% had ordered takeout or delivery. This means that restaurants actually remained consumers' leading discretionary spending priority.
But beneath those encouraging numbers sits a much more interesting story. Half of consumers now say covering household expenses is more difficult than it was a year ago. Thirty-nine percent reported spending less at restaurants than in the previous quarter, 40% were using discounts or value promotions more frequently, 36% had shifted toward less expensive restaurants and 34% were ordering fewer extras such as beverages and desserts.
The consumer hasn't necessarily stopped spending, the consumer has started editing.
Circana describes the emerging 2027 food and beverage environment as a period of "rationalization," forecasting U.S. retail food and beverage growth of approximately 2% to 3% in 2027. Its analysis suggests consumers are becoming more intentional, right-sizing purchases, reducing waste and optimizing where they spend while remaining prepared to invest in products they genuinely value.
That word, ‘rationalization’ may prove extremely important to the restaurant industry. Consumers still want restaurants, they still want discovery, indulgence and experience. They simply have less tolerance for paying for things that don't deliver.
Value Is Not Another Word for Cheap This is where restaurant strategy can go badly wrong. When traffic softens, the industry's instinct is often to reach for discounts, yet the evidence increasingly suggests that value is far more complicated than price.
Deloitte recently analyzed more than 416,000 consumer data points across 271 restaurant brands and found that food quality and service quality were the strongest drivers of restaurant purchase intent, followed by factors including speed, presentation, employee attitude, atmosphere and cleanliness. Significantly, its research found that brands perceived as delivering superior value outperform through execution and reliability rather than merely being inexpensive.
A $150 dinner can therefore represent excellent value while a $17 sandwich can represent terrible value. Consumers are increasingly making a more sophisticated calculation: Was that worth it? That calculation changes the role of trends. A new ingredient, cooking technique or presentation can no longer automatically justify a premium, rather the innovation itself must contribute to perceived value.
This may be one of the most important strategic shifts shaping 2027. When Everything Is Innovative, Nothing Is
Fresh-Roasted Coffee, Without Leaving the House
A third-generation LA roaster ships 50+ coffees — single origins, flavored favorites, decafs, even teas — days after roasting. Mix and match Keurig®-compatible boxes for tiered savings up to 34% off. First order? Take an extra 15% off, automatically.
The restaurant industry has become extraordinarily proficient at discovering the next thing. Hot honey, birria, ube, matcha, gochujang, chili crisp, Dubai chocolate, functional beverages, adaptogens, protein everything and smashburgers have moved through the food ecosystem with extraordinary speed.
This isn't inherently negative; global culinary cross-pollination is one of the most exciting developments of the modern food era. Consumers have access to ingredients, cuisines and culinary traditions previous generations could scarcely have imagined, and chefs possess an unprecedented creative palette.
The problem begins when trend adoption becomes a substitute for strategy. We have confused innovation with addition. Add another ingredient, another flavor, another cultural influence, another garnish, another preparation, and then add another paragraph to the menu description explaining all of it.
Hot honey wasn't enough, so we needed truffle hot honey. Burgers weren't enough, so we needed smashburgers. Then wagyu smashburgers, then wagyu smashburgers with kimchi, then wagyu smashburgers with kimchi, gochujang aioli and black sesame brioche.
At some point you have to feel sorry for the cow!
The commercial problem is that novelty carries a diminishing return. The first unfamiliar flavor generates discovery, the twentieth creates cognitive load. Consumers may enjoy experimentation, but they don't necessarily want every restaurant visit to require an education.
The strategic question therefore changes from "What trends should we adopt?" to "Which changes in consumer behavior are durable enough to deserve investment, and which are simply cultural noise?" Those are very different questions.
But there is another extreme; there is, however, a danger in taking this argument too far.
At a current TNI project particularly close to my heart, a Los Angeles private members club with a long history and an understandably mature membership, we have witnessed almost the reverse phenomenon. There, familiarity can be extraordinarily powerful. Members have emotional relationships with particular dishes, preparations and traditions, and seemingly minor changes can sometimes provoke reactions wildly disproportionate to the culinary significance of the change itself.
It is fascinating from a consumer-behavior perspective. A dish isn't simply a dish anymore, it represents continuity, memory, ownership and sometimes decades of personal experience. Change something and the consumer may not perceive that you have improved their dinner; they may perceive that you have taken something away from them. That presents an equally dangerous strategic trap.
Familiarity can create loyalty, but familiarity can also become inertia.
A restaurant cannot simply freeze itself at an arbitrary moment in its history and call that strategy. Ingredients improve, dietary expectations and needs change and consumer tastes evolve. Technology, added in, then changes how restaurants operate, younger customers eventually replace older ones, a concept that refuses to evolve because existing customers dislike change may protect today's customer while quietly eliminating tomorrow's.
History provides plenty of warnings about confusing familiarity with strategy. At its peak, Howard Johnson’s was one of America’s dominant restaurant chains, with more than 1,000 restaurants and a brand built around consistency, familiarity and recognizable menu items. However as American eating habits changed and competitors such as McDonald’s developed faster, more convenient and increasingly standardized formats, the very predictability that had once been Howard Johnson’s great strength gradually became a liability. Steak and Ale offers a similar lesson. Founded in 1966, it helped pioneer the casual-dining steakhouse experience, but as the competitive landscape evolved, the concept changed comparatively little and the original chain ultimately disappeared in 2008. Interestingly, Steak and Ale is now being revived with an approach that strategically combines the nostalgia and recognizable character of the original brand with a contemporary operating model, while early in its transition, so far, its working!
Both examples point to the same conclusion: heritage can be an extraordinary asset, but only if it evolves. The objective is to preserve the things consumers emotionally value without preserving the things that made sense only in the era in which the brand became successful.
The strategic challenge is therefore not choosing between familiarity and innovation. It is understanding what should remain familiar and what must evolve.
Perhaps the Caesar salad should remain recognizably a Caesar salad. But the Parmesan can be better, the lettuce fresher, the anchovies better sourced and the dressing made properly. The innovation occurs inside familiar architecture.
This is where consumer insight becomes considerably more important than trend chasing. Operators need to identify which aspects of their experience constitute genuine brand equity and which merely represent habit.
The Revenge of the Heritage Brand
This brings us to what I believe could become one of the more interesting opportunities of 2027: the renewed power of heritage.
In a marketplace overflowing with invented concepts, digitally manufactured brands and restaurants seemingly designed by the same Pinterest algorithm, history suddenly has value. A restaurant that can credibly say, "We've been making this since 1952," possesses something that cannot be fabricated by a branding agency: provenance.
The evidence is becoming increasingly interesting. Circana recently examined 15 nostalgia-based restaurant promotions and found that these promotions were more likely to succeed and produced a notably larger increase in total chain transactions than value-meal promotions, in both the short and longer term. Perhaps more surprisingly, nostalgia is not confined to older consumers. Circana finds Millennials and Gen Z engaging with retro products and experiences, including periods they did not personally experience.
That creates enormous possibilities for heritage restaurant brands, however heritage should not be confused with being old. The heritage brands with the greatest opportunity will be those that understand how to modernize the experience without destroying the memory. Keep the recipe, perhaps, but improve the ingredients, keep the ritual, but improve the service, keep the identity, but modernize the operation, and ofcourse; keep the history, but tell the story better.
This may create a fascinating new competitive advantage, the next generation of successful restaurant brands may include concepts that feel simultaneously older and newer: rooted in heritage, but contemporary in execution. Heritage will effectively become an asset class.
If operated with relevance and engaging strategy, legacy restaurant brands, regional institutions, classic dining formats, heritage dishes, original recipes and even retro visual identities will become increasingly valuable given they provide something scarce in an increasingly synthetic world: authenticity that can actually be proven.
The Algorithm Has Joined the Culinary Team
There is another reason the trend cycle has accelerated: restaurants are no longer developing food solely for humans, we are also developing it for algorithms. TikTok, Instagram and other platforms have democratized food discovery and exposed millions of people to cuisines they might otherwise never encounter. That is overwhelmingly positive. But social media has also transformed food into content, and content requires novelty. The algorithm doesn't particularly care whether a sandwich is delicious. It cares whether somebody stops scrolling.
Consequently, we have entered an era of food designed to stretch, drip, crunch, explode, pour, smoke or arrive on fire. We have accidentally created an entirely new restaurant KPI: Will somebody film it?
Sometimes that generates genuine creativity. Sometimes it produces a cheeseburger covered in melted cheese, placed inside another cheeseburger and delivered in a miniature shopping cart. The strategic and economic danger occurs when restaurants begin optimizing customer acquisition at the expense of customer retention.
A spectacular dish can persuade someone to visit once. It doesn't necessarily persuade them to return 20 times. Restaurants are not ultimately built on first visits, they are built on repeat behavior. The difference between "I have to try that" and "I can't wait to have that again" may become one of the defining distinctions of restaurant strategy in 2027.
The Quiet Luxury of Competence
This leads to a trend unlikely to set TikTok on fire: competence. Restaurants that answer the phone, that honor reservations, where the bathrooms are clean, where food arrives hot, where servers actually know the menu, where dietary requirements are handled confidently rather than treated as a surprise attack on the kitchen, and restaurants where the music doesn't require customers to communicate through semaphore.
While none of this sounds revolutionary, increasingly, it feels revolutionary.
Deloitte's research reinforces the point. Across restaurant formats, brands perceived as providing greater value consistently outperform on fundamentals such as food quality, service and execution. In QSR specifically, freshness produced a 15-percentage-point advantage among stronger-value brands in Deloitte's analysis. Interestingly, weaker-value brands could sometimes perform better on attributes such as trendiness or seating, but those surface characteristics did not necessarily translate into stronger future purchase intent.
For restaurant executives, that should be a sobering finding. Perhaps we have occasionally spent too much time making restaurants interesting and not enough time making them excellent.
Familiarity Is Not the Opposite of Innovation
The National Restaurant Association's current trend data provides perhaps the clearest evidence that the future isn't simply "old food." Its 2026 culinary forecast ranks local sourcing, comfort foods and value among the leading trends, but it simultaneously identifies global comfort foods, cleaner recipes, allergen-friendly menus, protein customization and clearer menu labeling. The consumer is effectively asking for comfort and discovery, familiarity and health, value and quality at the same time. That apparent contradiction is precisely what makes the 2027 landscape so interesting.
Consumers might seek out a classic cheeseburger made with cleaner ingredients, crave nostalgia while embracing zero-proof functional beverages, or choose a heritage restaurant while expecting state-of-the-art, frictionless digital reservations. They can value old-fashioned hospitality alongside AI-enabled personalization, or seek Italian food that respects centuries of tradition while expecting the restaurant serving it to understand contemporary dietary needs and preferences.
The future is not old versus new, instead it is meaningful versus meaningless.
So Are There Still Restaurant Trends in 2027?
Absolutely.
In fact, based on what the TNI street team and our researchers we have collected so far, TNI is predicting that 2027 may prove one of the more interesting restaurant and food trend years we have studied.
With that said, I believe we need to think differently about what constitutes a trend. Trend fatigue is not the absence of trends, instead it is a macro-condition determining which trends will survive.
Underneath that condition, we can already see a number of powerful movements developing: familiarity reimagined; the resurgence of heritage and nostalgia; global comfort foods; ingredient transparency and cleaner formulations; protein and functional nutrition; value without cheapness; menu simplification; changing portion expectations; local sourcing; human hospitality in an increasingly automated environment; and technology that removes friction rather than adding gimmicks.
Some of these trends appear contradictory. They aren't. They are different expressions of a consumer becoming more selective.
This also means that the traditional approach to trend forecasting, producing a shopping list of fashionable ingredients, is becoming less useful to restaurant leadership. A trend matters only when it intersects with a particular consumer, occasion, price point, brand and operating model.
A 200-unit QSR, a luxury hotel restaurant, an independent neighborhood restaurant, a private members club and a supermarket prepared-food program should not respond to the same trend in the same way.
Identifying a trend is relatively easy, understanding what to do about it is considerably harder.
That is where research, consumer insight, concept strategy, menu engineering, operational analysis and brand positioning increasingly have to intersect. Sometimes the right conclusion will be to embrace a trend aggressively. Sometimes it will be to reinterpret it, sometimes the smartest strategic recommendation may be to ignore it completely and sometimes we should simply leave a perfectly good cheeseburger alone.
The Great Consumer Filter
Perhaps, then, the defining characteristic of 2027 will not be one ingredient, cuisine or technology; it will be a filter.
Consumers remain curious, but increasingly selective. They remain willing to spend, but increasingly determined to receive value. They enjoy novelty, but appear to be rediscovering familiarity. They embrace technology, but still value human connection. They want healthier food without surrendering pleasure, global flavors without losing comfort and innovation without feeling as though somebody's product-development department has been allowed unsupervised access to the pantry.
That is not the death of trends, it is their maturation.
For restaurant owners and executives, the implications are significant. The winners may not be the companies that identify the greatest number of trends. They may be the companies that correctly identify the smallest number that actually matter to their customers and execute them exceptionally well.
Which brings us to the next question: If consumers are becoming more selective, and if familiarity, value, quality and trust are becoming more powerful, what does that mean for the menu itself?
Have restaurant menus become too large, too complicated and too operationally expensive? Have we accumulated dishes, ingredients and SKUs in the pursuit of choice and novelty that no longer create sufficient consumer value? Could fewer dishes actually produce more relevance, better execution, stronger margins and greater loyalty?
In the next article in our journey toward The Next Idea's 2027 Restaurant & Food Trends Report, I want to explore what I believe may be one of the most commercially significant changes ahead: The Great Menu Reset.
Because after years of asking what restaurants should add next, perhaps 2027 is finally the year we start asking an equally important question.
What can we take away?
About the Author, Robert Ancill
Robert Ancill is CEO of TNI Restaurant Consultants and The Next Idea Group. His work focuses on restaurant strategy, concept development, consumer behavior, operational performance, architecture and the changing relationship between relevance and customer choice.
Based in Los Angeles and originally from Glasgow, Scotland, Robert has led over 800 restaurant and café launches across 24 countries. His work focuses on the intersection of brand clarity, customer decision-making, and emerging market dynamics, advising leadership teams on how to maintain relevance in an increasingly complex and rapidly shifting environment.
A recognized authority on restaurant positioning, design, franchising, and evolving consumer behavior, Robert works with brands to close the growing gap between performance and relevance, developing strategies that align with how decisions are actually made today. He also serves as a board advisor to the AI-powered experience platform Atmosfy, where he contributes to the future of discovery and restaurant selection.
Robert is the creator of The Tolerance Scorecard and the author of multiple industry-leading publications, including his 2025 trilogy covering modern restaurant marketing, design, and the future of hospitality. His work is grounded in a simple principle: in today’s market, relevance is not assumed, it is constructed.
Recent Articles by Robert Ancill:
The Relevance Series:
Other Popular Articles:
Learn more about 2026 trends and how to take advantage here:
The 2026 Restaurant & Food Trends Report (issued January 2026) is available now and can be downloaded for free at: https://restaurantguru.mysamcart.com/checkout/the-ultimate-guide-to-2026-restaurant-food-trends
Contact Robert Ancill:
Office: (818) 343-5393 / Text (747) 249-4320
Books:
Websites
